1 Engagement Planning and Risk Assessment Explained
Key Concepts
- Engagement Planning
- Risk Assessment
- Materiality
- Audit Risk Model
- Internal Controls
- Audit Procedures
Engagement Planning
Engagement planning is the process of developing a strategy for an audit engagement. It involves understanding the client's business, assessing the risks, and determining the appropriate audit procedures to be performed. Effective planning ensures that the audit is efficient, effective, and meets professional standards.
Example: An auditor planning an audit of a manufacturing company would first review the company's operations, industry trends, and financial statements to identify key areas of focus.
Risk Assessment
Risk assessment is the process of identifying and evaluating the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. This involves understanding the client's business environment, internal controls, and inherent risks. The goal is to determine the level of audit effort required to address these risks.
Example: During a risk assessment, an auditor might identify that a company's inventory valuation is subject to significant risk due to complex production processes. This would lead to a more detailed audit of inventory.
Materiality
Materiality is the concept that determines the significance of an item in the financial statements. Items that could influence the decisions of users are considered material and require more attention during the audit. Materiality is used to focus audit efforts on areas that are most likely to affect the financial statements.
Example: If a company's revenue is $10 million, an error of $100,000 in revenue would be considered material and would require correction and disclosure in the financial statements.
Audit Risk Model
The audit risk model is a framework used to assess the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements. It consists of three components: Inherent Risk (IR), Control Risk (CR), and Detection Risk (DR). The model is expressed as: Audit Risk (AR) = IR x CR x DR. By understanding these risks, auditors can tailor their procedures to manage audit risk.
Example: If an auditor assesses Inherent Risk as high, Control Risk as moderate, and Detection Risk as low, the overall Audit Risk would be moderate. This would lead the auditor to perform more extensive audit procedures to reduce Detection Risk.
Internal Controls
Internal controls are the policies and procedures implemented by a company to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, enhance operational efficiency, and prevent fraud. Auditors evaluate internal controls to assess Control Risk and determine the extent of substantive procedures needed.
Example: A company's internal control over cash disbursements includes segregation of duties, approval processes, and reconciliation of bank statements. An auditor would test these controls to assess their effectiveness.
Audit Procedures
Audit procedures are the specific actions taken by auditors to gather evidence and evaluate the assertions in the financial statements. These procedures are designed based on the results of engagement planning and risk assessment to ensure that the audit is thorough and effective.
Example: After identifying a high risk in inventory valuation, an auditor might perform physical counts of inventory, review inventory turnover rates, and compare inventory levels to historical data.
Examples and Analogies
Consider engagement planning as "mapping a journey" for an audit, where understanding the client's business is like knowing the terrain. Risk assessment is akin to "identifying potential hazards" along the route, while materiality helps determine "which hazards are critical."
The audit risk model is like a "risk calculator" that helps auditors balance the risks they face. Internal controls are the "guardrails" that keep the financial reporting on track, and audit procedures are the "tools" used to inspect and ensure everything is in order.