2 Performing Audit Procedures and Evaluating Evidence Explained
Key Concepts
- Audit Procedures
- Audit Evidence
- Substantive Procedures
- Analytical Procedures
- Tests of Controls
- Evaluation of Evidence
Audit Procedures
Audit procedures are the specific actions taken by the auditor to gather evidence and evaluate the assertions made in the financial statements. These procedures are designed to ensure that the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
Example: An auditor may perform a physical inventory count to verify the accuracy of inventory balances reported in the financial statements.
Audit Evidence
Audit evidence is the information used by the auditor to determine whether the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework. This includes both documentary evidence (e.g., invoices, contracts) and corroborative evidence (e.g., confirmations from third parties).
Example: An auditor may request bank statements and confirmation letters from a company's bank to verify the accuracy of cash balances reported in the financial statements.
Substantive Procedures
Substantive procedures are audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements in the financial statements. These procedures include tests of details and analytical procedures that focus on the financial information itself.
Example: An auditor may perform a detailed test of accounts receivable by selecting a sample of customer invoices and verifying them against the company's records.
Analytical Procedures
Analytical procedures involve comparing financial information with expected results based on the auditor's understanding of the entity's business and industry. These procedures help identify unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate material misstatements.
Example: An auditor may compare the current year's sales revenue with the previous year's revenue to identify any significant variances that require further investigation.
Tests of Controls
Tests of controls are audit procedures designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the entity's internal controls. These procedures help the auditor determine the reliance they can place on the controls to reduce audit risk.
Example: An auditor may observe employees processing cash receipts to assess the effectiveness of the company's cash handling procedures.
Evaluation of Evidence
Evaluation of evidence involves assessing the relevance, reliability, and sufficiency of the audit evidence gathered. The auditor must ensure that the evidence supports the conclusions reached and the opinion expressed in the audit report.
Example: An auditor may evaluate the reliability of bank confirmation letters by comparing them with the company's bank statements to ensure they are consistent and accurate.
Examples and Analogies
Consider audit procedures as "tools in a toolbox," where each tool (procedure) is used to gather specific evidence. Audit evidence is like "building blocks" that help the auditor construct a complete picture of the financial statements.
Substantive procedures are akin to "detective work," where the auditor investigates the details of financial information to uncover any discrepancies. Analytical procedures are like "trend analysis," where the auditor looks for patterns and anomalies in the data.
Tests of controls are similar to "quality checks" in a manufacturing process, ensuring that internal controls are functioning as intended. Evaluation of evidence is like "quality assurance," where the auditor ensures that the gathered evidence is reliable and sufficient to support their conclusions.